[Poll] Continuation of feature/4?

[hasezoey]

mainly targeting @Ben305 @vinczedani @szokodiakos, but feedback from anyone is appreciated

I would ask if the continuation of the branch(/ something like that) would be appreciated?

Advantages would be:

• when using some thing like await new DummyModel({prop: 'hi'} as DummyType).save(); would not in any case require the typegoose(current) function to build a model, but still require the virtual properties ....
• would not add overhead with each class created

Disadvantages would be:

• i dont know any currently

would target something like Typegoose@6.0.0 for this kind of feature

[Ben305]

@hasezoey I haven't looked into the feature/4 branch but when there are some useful features inside, I would love to see these changes in master.

Unfortunately, my time is very limited at the moment...

[hasezoey]

I haven't looked into the feature/4 branch but when there are some useful features inside, I would love to see these changes in master.

currently feature/4 removes the Typegoose class, and makes all functions inside not needing a class, so this would resolve these setModelForClass etc is missing from T

but it would be a breaking change

[Ben305]

I think it's worth it, even it's a breaking change.

[hasezoey]

Closed - It will be integrated in 6.0.0, but a poll about how in #373