-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Performance on Columbia Gaze Dataset? #1
Comments
For Columbia I resized the images to 800 x 533 pixels for Columbia as otherwise it was taking too long to run and was getting false positives for face detection, this helped somewhat with gaze estimation. However, the results on Columbia were not as accurate as you mentioned (on a subset I get ~12 degrees mean and ~11 degrees median absolute error). At the moment gaze detection is the weakest part of OpenFace, but I am working on some improvements. Thanks, |
Hi, Will these improvements to gaze detection be released soon? (and how soon?) Thanks! |
This is a much longer term project and the timeline is more within 6 months to a year. |
to sync with TadasBaltrusaitis version
to sync with TadasBaltrusaitis version
to sync with TadasBaltrusaitis version
How did you get the mean error and absolute error gaze estimation for Columbia dataset? |
You can compute the gaze direction from the Columbia dataset by either using the gaze angles or actually computing the eye gaze vector from the location of the eye to the target they are looking at. |
@TadasBaltrusaitis |
Anyone who run the experiment? My result is terrible....
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: