Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider switching from coveralls to codecov.io #224

Open
sjoerdtalsma opened this issue Mar 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Consider switching from coveralls to codecov.io #224

sjoerdtalsma opened this issue Mar 22, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@sjoerdtalsma
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

There is a github action for uploading to coveralls.Unfortunately it doesn't understand jacoco XML output.
For the moment we use a maven plugin to report coverage to coveralls. Unfortunately this needs a coveralls repository token to work. Github Actions don't expose secrets to pull requests from forks (for good reason) therefore the reporting must be disabled from forks. Coverage information is verify valuable to assess pull requests so ideally it should be available there.

Describe the solution you'd like

Coverage reports from pull requests originating from forks.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Somehow convert the jacoco XML to coveralls compatible format. The maven plugin can do it, so why can't the Coveralls Github Action be fixed to support it?

Additional relevant information

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant