Type assertion fails when given function constructor

[i-like-robots]

Hello, I think I've found a bug when attempting to use the type assertion. I would expect the second assertion in the test case given below to pass based on the following documentation:

Type can be a string that matches the typeof value of the object, or the string name of any constructor in the object’s prototype chain, or a constructor function in the object’s prototype chain.

And here is a simple test case:

> t.type(new Function, 'function')
# ok 1 - type is function
# true 

> t.type(new Function, Function)
# not ok 2 - type is Function
# false

Details:

• Using Tap 10.2.2
• This error can be worked around by providing a string value (for typeof use case)

If this is confirmed as a bug I'd be happy to help fix it.