You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 6, 2020. It is now read-only.
I am comparing the speed of polymer and vue, it seems like polymer and much more faster.
Its not just the first paint / interative. I mean when i am clicking around, polymer responds faster. How it could be? Is the implementation different?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As @CaptainCodeman mentioned, there can be differences in server infrastructure, patterns used and much more between each implementation meaning these examples shouldn't be used as comparisons between JavaScript frameworks.
There's some great work going on in #42 which will make it clearer how each application is architected and what patterns and technologies are used.
The above answers are indeed correct. The Polymer implementation is using HTTP/2 Server Push, edge-caching and more aggressive code-splitting which combined together have an impact on the over time to interactivity of that implementation. Some of these concepts are also why the Preact implementation is also faster here.
I might suggest opening up an issue on the Vue HN repo about adding support for HTTP/2 Server Push as it would be interesting to see what impact that has on performance.
I am comparing the speed of polymer and vue, it seems like polymer and much more faster.
Its not just the first paint / interative. I mean when i am clicking around, polymer responds faster. How it could be? Is the implementation different?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: