-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sample algorithm steps "markdown" #3
Comments
Upon reflection I think I would prefer the following mapping for the basic symbol sets, instead of what I have above:
|
I'll comment a bit more on the other items in #1, but regarding lists, are you against using *? I think it displays nicely in plaintext and is easy to type... |
will using MD link syntax get us in trouble with the prevalence of [[internal]] all over? I can imagine if we utter |
Started https://github.com/domenic/ecmarkdown/ with a tiny subset. Let's move discussion over there so this repo can focus on Ecmarkup? |
Moving discussions over to ecmarkdown repo. |
Here's an idea to get things started:
Notable:
_x_
translates to<var>x</var>
, not<em>x</em>
or<i>x</i>
. Variables are by far the most common usage of italics in ES and it makes sense to prioritize them.*
for<b>
, not**
or__
. (I am not sure if it should be<b>true</b>
or<code>true</code>
...). The way Markdown allows*
and_
to be used interchangeably is a bit annoying and forces you to type two**
s and make sure you are consistent throughout the document. We'd be best off reserving double-punctuation for more rare things.[RejectPromise](_promise_, _reason_)
tells it to auto-link toRejectPromise
. It should be able to automatically figure that out without some kind of anchor; after all#sec-reject-promise
was generated from### RejectPromise ( promise, reason )
. This will work best if there are authoring-time tools to check that the auto-linking works correctly.1.
for steps, but we could use-
or even just a leading.
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: