Example seems incorrect (or confusing?)

[aickin]

Thanks for this proposal; seems really cool. I was confused by this example, though:

var person = { score: 75 };

var newScore = person.score
  |> double
  |> score => add(7, score)
  |> validateScore

newScore //=> 107

// As opposed to: var newScore = add(7, validateScore( double(person.score) ))

Now I don't know if there's a mistake in the example or if the proposal itself confuses me, but it seems really odd that the functions nest in a different order than they are piped. I would think that they would nest in the same order, with the first piped function as the innermost one, namely:

var newScore = validateScore(add(7, double(person.score) ));

Am I misunderstanding the example? Why do they neat in a different order for this case?

Thanks for all your great work!

[gilbert]

Aha, that is a mistake, thank you for pointing it out. I will fix it now.

[pitaj]

I think either the example is incorrect or the ad opposed to is.

👍

[aickin]

Awesome, thanks!

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.