Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Decide on the location for ECMA 402 proposal status #76

Closed
littledan opened this issue Oct 12, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

Decide on the location for ECMA 402 proposal status #76

littledan opened this issue Oct 12, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@littledan
Copy link
Member

Proposals in ECMA 402 also have their status documented at https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/blob/master/README.md . We should decide one place or the other being the source of truth. I don't think this repository has everything currently; maybe we should remove them from here.

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Oct 12, 2017

That makes total sense; would you mind making a PR that removes the 402 proposals from here, but also links to the 402 proposal list prominently? (assuming that you're OK with having 402 proposals there, and 262 proposals here)

Alternatively, we could move the 402 proposal list to its own directory in this repo - then this repo would be the source of truth.

@littledan
Copy link
Member Author

I'm fine with either of those, or even keeping it in the main list, just not the current incomplete duplication. Does anyone else have an opinion? @caridy ?

@chicoxyzzy
Copy link
Member

👍 on moving ECMA402 proposals to this repo as it happened with ECMA262 some time ago. As a side effect that will remove noise from spec repo.

@chicoxyzzy
Copy link
Member

I can make PRs in both repos if needed

@caridy
Copy link
Contributor

caridy commented Oct 18, 2017

👍 on moving the 402 proposals here. @chicoxyzzy feel free to send the PRs.

@chicoxyzzy
Copy link
Member

Preview of updated proposals table:
https://github.com/chicoxyzzy/proposals/blob/add_ecma402_proposals/README.md

@caridy
Copy link
Contributor

caridy commented Oct 25, 2017

PRs were merged on both repos. thanks @chicoxyzzy

@caridy caridy closed this as completed Oct 25, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants