Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature request] Connect to Existing User Databases #489

Closed
sqkkyzx opened this issue Mar 23, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

[Feature request] Connect to Existing User Databases #489

sqkkyzx opened this issue Mar 23, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@sqkkyzx
Copy link

sqkkyzx commented Mar 23, 2024

Description

I currently possess several databases and tables, for which I have written scripts for automating data table updates, as well as numerous custom trigger functions. I wish for Teable to be able to connect to these databases and tables to display them as tables and other views without the mandatory use of the Teable API for updates.

Additional Information

An acceptable alternative would be for Teable to provide a database connection scheme that allows full functionality for SELECT/UPDATE/DELETE operations.

I am currently using Nocodb, and you can review how they implement and provide the capability to connect to external databases for the open-source version.

Frankly speaking, although Teable attracts me with some of its features, I will not switch to Teable if it cannot allow me to connect to external databases. As a community user, I may not bring direct profit, but I kindly ask if there is any plan for such feature development, please inform me. This is because I am very interested in migrating to Teable for the following features:

  • Teable allows custom naming of field names in hosted tables, and the displayed names can differ from the database field names. On the contrary, Nocodb messes everything up by changing all database field names to filed, filed1, filed2...
  • Teable can change text fields to single-choice and automatically add all existing text values as options. Meanwhile, changing text fields to single-choice in Nocodb results in all values being displayed as blank. The only solution is to manually add all values as options, which becomes daunting when multiple fields need modification and each has more than ten types of values.
  • Teable seems to have better performance.

@mz0in
Copy link

mz0in commented Mar 23, 2024

There are so many things teable is ahead , I think such a future will be on the roadmap regarding how important it's

@sqkkyzx sqkkyzx changed the title Feature Request: Connect to Existing User Databases [Feature request] Connect to Existing User Databases Apr 10, 2024
@sqkkyzx sqkkyzx closed this as completed Apr 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants