Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the baseline of Java any-code completion #7

Closed
ShangwenWang opened this issue Dec 17, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

About the baseline of Java any-code completion #7

ShangwenWang opened this issue Dec 17, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@ShangwenWang
Copy link

Dear authors,
Thanks for your work!
Your work is really great since there is no any-code completion tool before. I wonder would you release the baseline you designed to compare with AnyCodeGen on Java language (e.g., the retrained code2seq). I find building and retraining them would cause lots of time and energy. Thanks.

@ShangwenWang
Copy link
Author

I mean can I query the trained code2seq like this
Really need your help. Thanks

@urialon
Copy link
Contributor

urialon commented Dec 17, 2020

Hi @ShangwenWang,
Thank you for your interest in our paper!

This baseline was a prototype adaptation of code2seq to SLM by taking the data of SLM and converting it to the code2seq format.

The head_paths from SLM are the paths that we used in code2seq.
The target sequence (that should be predicted) in code2seq is the linearized_tree in SLM or target_seq (depending on whether you wish to predict the target as a sequence of tokens or a linearized tree).

Best,
Uri

@ShangwenWang
Copy link
Author

Dear @urialon
Thanks for your reply. I wonder will you provide a query link to the adaptation just like you have done for AnyCodeGen.
It is time consuming if retraining the model, not to mention any technical problem I might meet.

@urialon urialon closed this as completed May 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants