Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build arm image (and update actions) #217

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 28, 2023
Merged

Conversation

pat-s
Copy link
Contributor

@pat-s pat-s commented Aug 25, 2023

Fix #213

@pat-s
Copy link
Contributor Author

pat-s commented Sep 7, 2023

https://github.com/techknowlogick/xgo/actions/runs/5976967326/job/16227759451?pr=217#step:7:31685

Well 😆 @techknowlogick Can you increase the runner size? It looks like it works in theory...

@techknowlogick
Copy link
Owner

techknowlogick commented Sep 7, 2023

sadly, it seems I can only increase the hosted runner size if I were an org:
CleanShot 2023-09-07 at 11 19 35@2x

I'll need to setup a self-hosted runner 😮‍💨

@pat-s
Copy link
Contributor Author

pat-s commented Sep 7, 2023

Move to Gitea org? 😅

@techknowlogick
Copy link
Owner

Move to Gitea org? 😅

@pat-s After looking into the requirements even more, the gitea org doesn't apply there are additional overhead costs more than just the runner. So I'm still going to look into self-hosted.

@pat-s
Copy link
Contributor Author

pat-s commented Sep 7, 2023

If you don't have anything existing yet, the Woodpecker org might maybe be happy to let you join their self-hosted Woodpecker instance which is already in use in their GH (as they make use of xgo down the road themselves).

@pat-s
Copy link
Contributor Author

pat-s commented Sep 27, 2023

@techknowlogick I've found an action which frees up disk space on the runner. Maybe this helps to get the build passing.

@pat-s
Copy link
Contributor Author

pat-s commented Sep 28, 2023

Used the wrong workflow file...

@pat-s
Copy link
Contributor Author

pat-s commented Sep 28, 2023

Next try due to apparent apt renaming issue

@techknowlogick techknowlogick marked this pull request as ready for review September 28, 2023 15:39
@techknowlogick techknowlogick merged commit 6bf203c into techknowlogick:main Sep 28, 2023
1 check passed
@pat-s pat-s deleted the arm branch September 28, 2023 16:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Docker images for arm64?
2 participants