Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[utils] Improve the performance of encode() and encodeHive() functions #818

Closed
frbattid opened this issue Feb 22, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

[utils] Improve the performance of encode() and encodeHive() functions #818

frbattid opened this issue Feb 22, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees
@frbattid
Labels
should techdebt
Milestone
release/1.0.0

Comments

@frbattid
Copy link
Member

Do as described in the first answer at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6262397/string-replaceall-is-considerably-slower-than-doing-the-job-yourself

Effort: 1 man day
@frbattid frbattid added this to the release/0.13.0 milestone Feb 22, 2016
@frbattid frbattid assigned frbattid and unassigned pcoello25 Feb 23, 2016
@frbattid frbattid modified the milestones: release/0.14.0, release/0.13.0 Feb 26, 2016
@frbattid frbattid mentioned this issue Mar 2, 2016
Merged
@frbattid
Copy link
Member Author

frbattid commented Mar 3, 2016

Implemented in PR #842

@frbattid frbattid closed this as completed Mar 3, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@frbattid frbattid

Labels
should techdebt
Projects
None yet
Milestone
release/1.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@frbattid @pcoello25