interop meetup tue the 14th? #16
Comments
That works for me. I diff'ed the protocol spec last night, and made a list of things I need to change before the interop. |
which timezone exactly? I'm on GMT+1. |
How about start at 10a Mountain time (GMT -7)? Does that work for you @fd too? |
Unfortunately I can't make it the 14th as I have other plans that evening. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Jeremie Miller notifications@github.comwrote:
|
I'm good on Wed too, that work or not work for anyone else? |
Wednesday the 15th at 10am MST would be preferable to me, too.
|
Wednesday works for me, too. |
wednesday is ok too |
I'll be in Co Springs next week from Monday evening, back Friday at noon - but I could possibly do a remote interop! |
I think we're confirmed for this Wednesday, 10A Denver time (5P GMT) at Galvanize and online in xmpp:theroom@conference.jabber.org (plus we might try using a hangout for a bit), see you all then! |
Well I had a great time today, but I think we all need to "try using a hangout for a bit" just to introduce ourselves in the next week or two. |
Def! How about a hangout/online only meetup Wed the 29th at the same time, 10a Mountain (GMT-7)? |
That works for me. I'm all about Hangouts. To be honest, the coffee shop at Galvanize was a bit noisy for someone a bit hard of hearing such as myself to be able to fully participate. :) |
I figured this is a nice open place to coordinate a meetup for everyone working on switch implementations, @temas @dwaite @stpeter @simmons @dvanduzer @jaytaph @fd @andymuldowney
I'd love to have a time when we can all be online and do some interop testing between all of our implementations next Tuesday, and since we're pretty geo-diverse it might be best in the morning US-time?
Since there's a contingent of us here in Denver I'd love to try to meet up in person too if people's work-schedules are flexible enough to get an hour or so away, perhaps at galvanize?
My hope is that in the next month we can solidify the current base spec and implementations enough to stamp a 0.9 version (or something more beta-ish) and start to get a wider audience experimenting with it all :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: