Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kernel panic at skbuff.c #2042

Open
EvgeniiMekhanik opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Kernel panic at skbuff.c #2042

EvgeniiMekhanik opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@EvgeniiMekhanik
Copy link
Contributor

[ 1768.037843] [tempesta fw] Warning: cpu 0(4), backlog size 0, active connections mask 0x0, cntwork queue size 0, close backlog is empty
[ 1768.038586] [tempesta fw] Warning: cpu 1(4), backlog size 0, active connections mask 0x0, cntwork queue size 0, close backlog is empty
[ 1768.039332] [tempesta fw] Warning: cpu 2(4), backlog size 0, active connections mask 0x100000000, cntwork queue size 0, close backlog is empty
[ 1768.040133] [tempesta fw] Warning: cpu 3(4), backlog size 0, active connections mask 0x0, cntwork queue size 0, close backlog is empty
[ 1768.040876] [tempesta fw] Warning: cpu 4(4), backlog size 0, active connections mask 0x2000000000, cntwork queue size 0, close backlog is empty
[ 1769.503358] skbuff: skb_under_panic: text:ffffffffc0c68060 len:405 put:13 head:ffff98d66e76e580 data:ffff98d66e76e57b tail:0x140 end:0x140 dev:(efault)
[ 1769.505054] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 1769.505723] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:111! (I am not sure, because I catch it on my branch)

@EvgeniiMekhanik EvgeniiMekhanik self-assigned this Jan 26, 2024
@EvgeniiMekhanik
Copy link
Contributor Author

This BUG is very rarely. Was reproduced at 9af1fda at MTU 80 after stress tests.

@krizhanovsky krizhanovsky added this to the 0.9 - LA milestone Jan 26, 2024
@EvgeniiMekhanik
Copy link
Contributor Author

It is easy to reproduce, just return -ENOMEM from tls_encrypt and do not stop test. On each call of tls_encrypt we call ss_skb_expand_head_tail for same skb until BUG will be reproduced

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants