Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the performance when using some filters (USM) is not good #10

Closed
mygmyg opened this issue Apr 9, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

the performance when using some filters (USM) is not good #10

mygmyg opened this issue Apr 9, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mygmyg
Copy link

mygmyg commented Apr 9, 2020

when i test it on a video using unsharp mask filter, the mos is better, but the value of dqva is lower,the value of vmaf is higher; may be caused by the training data(more likely), or by the network (the use of residual frames);

any solution for prefilter or postprefilter?

@tommyhq
Copy link
Collaborator

tommyhq commented Apr 9, 2020

This is a known issue. I am also interested in this problem. There are several possible reasons:

  1. Current training data involves only H.264 compression on PGC reference, without any pre- or post-filtering.
  2. Things get complicated when enhancement is in the pipeline.
  3. I am not sure whether your test video is UGC or PGC. The trained model might not perform well on UGC sequences.

We are considering to develop new models to deal with UGC pre-processed with unsharp filter (FFMPEG), as well as UGC compressed with H.264 encoder.

It takes time as we have to do everything from scratch, i.e. test sequences, subjective data, model tweaking, etc.

@tommyhq tommyhq added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 9, 2020
@tommyhq tommyhq closed this as completed Jun 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants