Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why fem is different with paper #23

Closed
GGjerry01 opened this issue Apr 15, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

why fem is different with paper #23

GGjerry01 opened this issue Apr 15, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@GGjerry01
Copy link

image
image

@lijiannuist
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,this fem function is just right part of picture,which is constructed by dilation conv,the left part is fpn.

@GGjerry01
Copy link
Author

Hi,this fem function is just right part of picture,which is constructed by dilation conv,the left part is fpn.

thanks, reply. ye i am confusing with the structure of dilation conv. in paper, splitting the dimension N to N/3. each one does diffierent dilation conv and then cat it. the output is N. but in the function ,the output is 512 right?

@lijiannuist
Copy link
Contributor

Yes,the structure of dilation conv outputs feature maps,which have the same channel numbers N=512. N also can be unified to be 512 by fpn(left part).

@GGjerry01
Copy link
Author

Yes,the structure of dilation conv outputs feature maps,which have the same channel numbers N=512. N also can be unified to be 512 by fpn(left part).

so,it splits 512 to 256,128,128 not 512/3 right?

@lijiannuist
Copy link
Contributor

yes,N/3 just means three branches,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants