Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: flaky light client test #5999

Closed
erikgrinaker opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #6744
Closed

test: flaky light client test #5999

erikgrinaker opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #6744
Assignees
Labels
C:light Component: Light T:test Type: Tests that need love

Comments

@erikgrinaker
Copy link
Contributor

Had a spurious test failure, this is all the logs said:

2021/01/27 19:25:46 all witnesses have either not responded, don't have the blocks or sent invalid blocks. 
	You should look to change your witnesses or review the light client's logs for more information
FAIL	github.com/tendermint/tendermint/light	170.857s
@erikgrinaker erikgrinaker added the T:test Type: Tests that need love label Jan 27, 2021
@tessr tessr added the C:light Component: Light label Feb 1, 2021
@tessr tessr added this to Untriaged 🥚 in Tendermint Core Project Board via automation Feb 1, 2021
@tessr tessr moved this from Untriaged 🥚 to To Do 📝 in Tendermint Core Project Board Feb 1, 2021
@cmwaters
Copy link
Contributor

cmwaters commented Feb 5, 2021

Do you know what test it was? I will see if I can reproduce it

@erikgrinaker
Copy link
Contributor Author

erikgrinaker commented Feb 5, 2021

No, this was everything the logs contained. I've seen a couple of other flaky light client tests as well. You can try running this until something fails:

$ while go test -v -count 1 -race ./light/...; do true; done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:light Component: Light T:test Type: Tests that need love
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants