AWS EFS Policy Default

[MaruElbostahi]

Description

Please provide a clear and concise description of the issue you are encountering, and a reproduction of your configuration (see the examples/* directory for references that you can copy+paste and tailor to match your configs if you are unable to copy your exact configuration). The reproduction MUST be executable by running terraform init && terraform apply without any further changes.

If your request is for a new feature, please use the Feature request template.

• [ x ] ✋ I have searched the open/closed issues and my issue is not listed.

⚠️ Note

Before you submit an issue, please perform the following first:

1. Remove the local .terraform directory (! ONLY if state is stored remotely, which hopefully you are following that best practice!): rm -rf .terraform/
2. Re-initialize the project root to pull down modules: terraform init
3. Re-attempt your terraform plan or apply and check if the issue still persists

Versions

• Module version [Required]:

• Terraform version: 1.3.7

• Provider version(s): 1.1.1

Reproduction Code [Required]

Steps to reproduce the behavior:
You have to create an efs with the module and set the "deny_nonsecure_transport = true"
The policy that this will generate will not be right, but it will be incomplete

no yes i did it

Expected behavior

I am expecting that the bug will be solved and the wrong policy will be changed with the correct one

Actual behavior

I was not able to mount and i got a message "access denied, even if i had all the permission"

Terminal Output Screenshot(s)

Additional context

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open 30 days
with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this issue will be closed in 10 days

[github-actions]

This issue was automatically closed because of stale in 10 days

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

[antonbabenko]

This issue has been resolved in version 1.4.0 🎉