Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Added Zabbix rules #255

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 22, 2022
Merged

feat: Added Zabbix rules #255

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 22, 2022

Conversation

antonbabenko
Copy link
Member

@antonbabenko antonbabenko commented Aug 22, 2022

Description

This adds the needed ports for Zabbix server, proxy and agent

Closes #253

Motivation and Context

We are trying to fully automate the install of Zabbix infrastructure and this will make it easier to open the needed ports

Breaking Changes

How Has This Been Tested?

  • I have updated at least one of the examples/* to demonstrate and validate my change(s)
  • I have tested and validated these changes using one or more of the provided examples/* projects
  • I have executed pre-commit run -a on my pull request

@antonbabenko antonbabenko changed the title feat zabbix feat: Added Zabbix rules Aug 22, 2022
@antonbabenko antonbabenko merged commit d29295c into master Aug 22, 2022
@antonbabenko antonbabenko deleted the feat-zabbix branch August 22, 2022 11:27
antonbabenko pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2022
## [4.12.0](v4.11.0...v4.12.0) (2022-08-22)

### Features

* Added Zabbix rules ([#255](#255)) ([d29295c](d29295c))
@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member Author

This PR is included in version 4.12.0 🎉

@bikeusaland
Copy link

I am more than happy to contribute to the open source community, but can you please at least make me a co-author to this?

@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member Author

You have forked this module inside https://github.com/MAARK organization, where I didn't have push access to push the fixed docs, so I have opened another PR and merged it with reference to the original PR.

Thank you for the addition!

@sanguis
Copy link

sanguis commented Aug 22, 2022

hi @antonbabenko Just wondering why @bikeusaland did not get any attribute for his commit, ate the least a co authorship should happen

@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member Author

In general, I agree it would be great to have the avatars of the contributors in the readme in all repositories.

@sanguis Where do you think I could put @bikeusaland as a co-author? The commits are being squashed during the merge of this PR, and the changelog.md is automatically generated from the commit messages during release.

As I wrote in the previous comment, when the fork belongs to an organization where I don't have push right, I have to make a new PR and add missing changes prior to the merge. This is the way it has been working here in github.

I am open to suggestions on general improvements to the processes, so please don't hesitate an issue here - https://github.com/terraform-aws-modules/meta .

@bikeusaland
Copy link

bikeusaland commented Aug 25, 2022 via email

@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member Author

Right, I am sorry that I have not included you in this. It was not on purpose :)

We were updating the release process some time ago, and in the past (for a couple of years) it was important that the commit description was empty not to break the changelog.md. I got used to that habit (looks like)!

@sanguis
Copy link

sanguis commented Aug 29, 2022

All good, It just helps me justify, getting the company to pay us to contribute. :)
If there is anything we can do to help improve this process. Allowing the release commits to have comments in the release commits. (I am a huge regex nerd).

Create an issue and assign myself and or @bikeusaland

@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member Author

terraform-aws-modules/meta#31 - here is an issue to remind us.

@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 15, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants