Issue #6144 Resource 'aws_iam_role_policy.example_policy' does not have attribute 'name'

[saravanan30erd]

Fixes #6144

Output from acceptance testing:

$ make testacc TEST=./aws/ TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws/ -v -parallel 20 -run=TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_importBasic
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_importBasic
=== RUN   TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_namePrefix
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_namePrefix
=== RUN   TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_generatedName
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_generatedName
=== RUN   TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_invalidJSON
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_invalidJSON
=== CONT  TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_importBasic
=== CONT  TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_generatedName
=== CONT  TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_namePrefix
=== CONT  TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_invalidJSON
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_invalidJSON (3.39s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_importBasic (56.54s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_generatedName (74.13s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_namePrefix (74.94s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_basic (77.07s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws
...

[bflad]

LGTM, thanks @saravanan30erd!! 🚀

--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_invalidJSON (0.74s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_importBasic (8.66s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_generatedName (12.59s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_namePrefix (12.91s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMRolePolicy_basic (12.97s)

[bflad]

This has been released in version 1.42.0 of the AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!