Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

data source azurerm_dns_zone: make resource_group_name required #7680

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 16, 2020

Conversation

njuCZ
Copy link
Contributor

@njuCZ njuCZ commented Jul 10, 2020

according to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/dns/dns-zones-records#dns-zones, dns zone name is only unique in resource group. Different resource group could use the same dns zone name. it's not unique global.

So I think it does not make sense to search all resource group and return first found result.

@ghost ghost added the size/M label Jul 10, 2020
@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Member

hey @njuCZ

Thanks for this PR.

Taking a look through here - whilst these can be unique per resource group, Terraform should still support looking these up - however Terraform should raise an error if multiple DNS Zones are found with the same name, would you be able to update this PR to fix this instead?

Thanks!

2. check whether two dns zone have the same name
@njuCZ
Copy link
Contributor Author

njuCZ commented Jul 14, 2020

@tombuildsstuff I have modified this PR, please have a look again.

  1. use listComplete rather than list all resource group and then ListByResourceGroup
  2. when user does not specify resource_group_name, reports error if two dns zone have the same name
  3. because resource group of dns zone is always lower case, change the test case to avoid check fail

@ghost ghost removed the waiting-response label Jul 14, 2020
Copy link
Member

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

left a couple of comments but this otherwise LGTM 👍

azurerm/internal/services/dns/dns_zone_data_source.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/dns/dns_zone_data_source.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@njuCZ
Copy link
Contributor Author

njuCZ commented Jul 14, 2020

@tombuildsstuff thanks for your suggestions. I have updated this PR, please have a look again

@ghost ghost removed the waiting-response label Jul 14, 2020
Copy link
Member

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

otherwise LGTM 👍

azurerm/internal/services/dns/dns_zone_data_source.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/dns/dns_zone_data_source.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/dns/dns_zone_data_source.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/dns/dns_zone_data_source.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/dns/dns_zone_data_source.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/dns/dns_zone_data_source.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/internal/services/dns/dns_zone_data_source.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@njuCZ
Copy link
Contributor Author

njuCZ commented Jul 15, 2020

@tombuildsstuff thanks for your suggestions. I have updated this function to return a pointer. in order to use the same variable resp and resourceGroup, I made a little change in the read func, please have a check

@ghost ghost removed the waiting-response label Jul 15, 2020
@jackofallops
Copy link
Member

Tests passing:
image

@jackofallops jackofallops merged commit 5488ce5 into hashicorp:master Jul 16, 2020
jackofallops added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 16, 2020

This has been released in version 2.19.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.19.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 15, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 15, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants