We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Much like #91 it would be nice if toHaveValue also supported asymmetricMatch. for expect.stringContaining or expect.stringMatching etc.
toHaveValue
use this.equal instead of lodash for comparison.
using toHaveAttribute("value", expect.stringContaining('foo')
should be pretty straight forward to update all the things.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Describe the feature you'd like:
Much like #91 it would be nice if
toHaveValue
also supported asymmetricMatch. for expect.stringContaining or expect.stringMatching etc.Suggested implementation:
use this.equal instead of lodash for comparison.
Describe alternatives you've considered:
using toHaveAttribute("value", expect.stringContaining('foo')
Teachability, Documentation, Adoption, Migration Strategy:
should be pretty straight forward to update all the things.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: