The illogical disappearance of sticky bombs.

[twilightwanderer]

When designing faxes, I planned to be able to send sticky bombs along with the paper. I found this idea quite amusing. But in my planned fax update, I wanted to rework this mechanic to make it less "evil". While studying the sticky bomb mechanics, I came across an interesting flaw in their current implementation.

Reproduction:

It is enough to trigger a qdel object to remove the bomb as well. From a purely technical point of view it is clear why this is necessary, but such a possibility opens up too easy a way to combat such bombs.

[timothymtorres]

In line with #69484, I don't see this as a bug since it's a niche thing and removes counterplay.

[dragomagol]

I disagree, it doesn't make sense for a bomb to just disappear because the paper was burnt up

[SpaceVampire]

I had a similar issue before where I attached a C4 to a stool, picked up the stool, and it made the bomb vanish.

[twilightwanderer]

I had a similar issue before where I attached a C4 to a stool, picked up the stool, and it made the bomb vanish.

The bomb, by the mechanics of implementation, disappears on any object. I haven't checked it myself yet, but another developer told me that he observed this behavior simply by changing the item icon.

I don't even know how to fix this bomb behavior when you call Destroy() on the object the bomb is attached to.

[msgerbs]

Could you add a .Destroy() override for the bomb that moves it to the tile the object is on?