is it possible to name the buckets with real names and not hash?

[yanivbhemo]

Hi,
Is it possible to name the buckets created with custom names and not generated hash?

Thanks!

[rogalv]

Hi Yaniv,

take a look at #120 - is it the same idea - to add some custom prefix to the bucket name? It is planned for the future release.

[yanivbhemo]

Hi @rogalv,
First of all, thank you so much for the ongoing support!
Two more questions:

1. Is there any approx. time for the release?
2. Will it be possible to just use the service name (bucket name) without the guid (hash)? and if so - to avoid duplications.

Thank you!

[rogalv]

1. No clear date, but I'd expect it to be at around end of august.
2. Current idea is to keep random guid as part of name - to avoid duplications - so the name will look like [broker prefix]-[optional custom binding prefix]-[guid]. Do you suggest to have an option to fully override bucket name?

[yanivbhemo]

I would suggest that yes, avoid the hash and I will explain why :
The current use-case we are working on is for 1000X buckets, in that quantity duplications at the service name will happen and I would like to avoid that. The guid will let that happen. And if so I will need to search for the right guid.

[rogalv]

Hi @yanivbhemo , take a look at release 2.0.1 - it includes custom name prefix for instances and bindings (#120 )