Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make a cleaner TypeDesc and make default implementation more real-wordly #30

Closed
thenameless314159 opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #33
Closed

Make a cleaner TypeDesc and make default implementation more real-wordly #30

thenameless314159 opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #33
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@thenameless314159
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@thenameless314159 thenameless314159 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 21, 2023
@thenameless314159 thenameless314159 self-assigned this Jun 21, 2023
@thenameless314159 thenameless314159 changed the title Remove TypeDesc and make default implementation more real-wordly Make a cleaner TypeDesc and make default implementation more real-wordly Jun 22, 2023
@thenameless314159 thenameless314159 mentioned this issue Jun 22, 2023
6 tasks
thenameless314159 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2023
# Warning: this update contains **breaking changes**

(well like most previous updates)

## Planning

- [x] Resolve #31
- [x] Resolve  #29 
- [x] Resolve  #30 
- [x] Resolve  #25 
- [x] 100% unit-tests coverage
- [x] Documentation and readme update
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant