[FEAT]: ChOA & SOA

[Wonder9988]

Description

I think ChOA also borders on plagiarism, it is very similar to GWO and the size determining position change of μ mentioned in the paper is not mentioned at all in the code provided by the authors and in the improvement paper published by the authors about ChOA.
Moreover, SOA can also be considered as plagiarized, which is almost identical to WOA.

Additional Information

No response

[thieu1995]

@Wonder9988 ,

I think you can write a comment paper to the journal that accepted the ChOA and SOA, if the author cannot answer your question regarding plagiarism or fake results. The journal will surely retract the paper.

If you're interested in writing such a paper, we could collaborate together. You can send me an email at nguyenthieu2102@gmail.com. Please make sure to prepare proof and questions regarding the plagiarism.
It takes some effort to clean up the environment properly.