You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tested packaging our extension using the built-in tool in Chrome browser vs. this module and the size difference can be pretty large -- in our case it's ~700kB smaller when using the Chrome browser.
After short investigation, I have found out that if you pass level 9 ("best compression") to zlib, size of the package will be reduced to similar size. The CRX will load just fine in Chrome browser.
For now, I have hard patched the module in node_modules folder but this is not ideal.
I tested packaging our extension using the built-in tool in Chrome browser vs. this module and the size difference can be pretty large -- in our case it's ~700kB smaller when using the Chrome browser.
After short investigation, I have found out that if you pass level 9 ("best compression") to zlib, size of the package will be reduced to similar size. The CRX will load just fine in Chrome browser.
For now, I have hard patched the module in
node_modules
folder but this is not ideal.https://github.com/oncletom/crx/blob/master/src/index.js#L130
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: