Aperture growth apodization for curvilinear arrays

[l-l-z]

When I tried using the aperture growth apodization function with a curvilinear transducer (TransducerConvex), I got a warning that only linear arrays (TransducerArray) are currently supported. Are you planning on expanding the implementation of that apodization function to include curvilinear transducers in the near future?

[thorstone25]

We can add that as a feature, yes. It's a trivial extension as you would only need to switch from a definition based on depth vs. width to depth vs. angle I believe. I can't promise a timeline for when I would be able to do that myself though.