Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The Syncer Protocol #25

Closed
10 of 13 tasks
boonhapus opened this issue Apr 20, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed
10 of 13 tasks

The Syncer Protocol #25

boonhapus opened this issue Apr 20, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
@boonhapus
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@boonhapus
Copy link
Collaborator

boonhapus commented Apr 20, 2022 •
edited

First Stop

  • I have read and agreed to the ThoughtSpot Dev Tools EULA.
  • I understand that if I have a critical issue with ThoughtSpot, I should reach out to my account team instead of cs_tools.
  • I searched the cs_tools documentation, with the integrated search.

Description

Future improvements to the Syncer Protocol.

Support for common data storage formats

  • ThoughtSpot Falcon
  • Snowflake
  • Google BigQuery
  • Amazon Redshift
  • Google Sheets
  • Microsoft Excel
  • CSV
  • SQLite
  • JSON
  • Apache Parquet

This post will continue to grow until we reach CS Tool v2.0
@boonhapus boonhapus added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 20, 2022
@boonhapus boonhapus self-assigned this May 29, 2022
@boonhapus boonhapus added the question Further information is requested label May 31, 2022
@boonhapus
Copy link
Collaborator Author

With the v1.4.0 release, we'll move to an inherited registry approach. This give us more benefits when defining an actual Syncer implementation. Protocols/ducktyping is nice, but inheritance will be a stronger pattern here now that we can rely directly on cs_tools.

As part of the improvements, we can support ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE / UPSERT / MERGE implementations in all of our Database Syncers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@boonhapus boonhapus

Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@boonhapus