Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some questions about Prior-Association #22

Closed
A-New-Page opened this issue Aug 16, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Some questions about Prior-Association #22

A-New-Page opened this issue Aug 16, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@A-New-Page
Copy link

Thanks for submitting such a great job, but I have some questions with prior-association of the code

sigma = torch.sigmoid(sigma * 5) + 1e-5
sigma = torch.pow(3, sigma) - 1

In this part, some mathematical processing is done on the sigma
Could you please explain some reasons for doing this?
I can not find any reference in your paper.

@wuhaixu2016
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a trick to make the training more stable.
In our previous experiments, if you just use the sigma directly, you can also obtain a good performance.

@A-New-Page
Copy link
Author

A-New-Page commented Aug 18, 2022

Thank you for your reply.I have another question about the dataset.

In the experimental dataset, are there any abnormal points in the training set?
In appendix K of this paper, Table 13 presents the information about experimental dataset, where AR represents the truth abnormal proportion of the whole dataset. Does AR represent the abnormal proportion in the test set?

@wuhaixu2016
Copy link
Collaborator

(1) The training set does contain abnormal points. Since we focus on the unsupervised method, we do not use the label in the training process.
(2) AR is counted from the combination of all data, including both the training and test.

@A-New-Page
Copy link
Author

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants