You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found that all the messages in this discussion forums are having the SAME email ID, so that all those messages are put in the same conversation in the Thunderbird-conversations. So, when I click on a new message, it takes some seconds to load the whole messages thread, especially some messages are several years ago. The whole Thunderbird are hanging for a while.
So my question is: Is there an option that I can set to let the add-on only load the recent messages, for example, only load the messages in one year?
BTW: I think Gmail web are quite smart, they don't put those messages in the same conversation, I'm not sure how Gmail web did, maybe, they group messages by email subjects?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I still see sometimes, TB will hang for several seconds or when I click the message, the whole thread will take several seconds to show up. My original reported issue still exits, though I see you mentioned here:
What did you do?
I have subscribe some discussion in sourceforge, such as this one:
https://sourceforge.net/p/asymptote/discussion/409349
I found that all the messages in this discussion forums are having the SAME email ID, so that all those messages are put in the same conversation in the Thunderbird-conversations. So, when I click on a new message, it takes some seconds to load the whole messages thread, especially some messages are several years ago. The whole Thunderbird are hanging for a while.
So my question is: Is there an option that I can set to let the add-on only load the recent messages, for example, only load the messages in one year?
BTW: I think Gmail web are quite smart, they don't put those messages in the same conversation, I'm not sure how Gmail web did, maybe, they group messages by email subjects?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: