Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Why not providing HTTP and SOCKS proxy implementation? #2689

Closed
aurora-anon opened this issue Aug 19, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Why not providing HTTP and SOCKS proxy implementation? #2689

aurora-anon opened this issue Aug 19, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@aurora-anon
Copy link

No description provided.

@philipwhiuk
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate

@aurora-anon
Copy link
Author

I love the way you develop software.

@Valodim
Copy link
Contributor

Valodim commented Aug 22, 2017

In our free time, you mean ;)

But yes, @philipwhiuk could have referenced what it's a duplicate of. Then again, could have searched for the issue before opening as the template instructs rather than just deleting it to post a question that is like to have come up in the past couple of uh, years.

See #980

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@Valodim @philipwhiuk @aurora-anon