Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

about the model #4

Closed
liuzheng081 opened this issue Mar 6, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

about the model #4

liuzheng081 opened this issue Mar 6, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@liuzheng081
Copy link

Hi,
i tried the model with demo/compare-prediction.ipynb use our tamper image data . but the result is not good .
can you help me how to fineturn with your model in the project

@thuyngch
Copy link
Owner

thuyngch commented Mar 7, 2019

As mentioned in the technical report, we trained models using the CASIA2 dataset. Therefore, we just limit the scope of the project in this dataset for benchmarking.

If you test images come from the CASIA2 dataset, the performance will be acceptable. In the case of another dataset (i.e., your prepared dataset), the distribution may be different from one of CASIA2. Thus, if you want to make the model more generalized, you should try to train it with more data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants