You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In Eq.3, the PAL loss uses logits (f_theta) instead of probabilities (p_theta). When using logits, it seems that the parts inside the parenthesis can become negative. When the parts inside the parenthesis becomes negative, the log operation cannot be performed. When using probabilities, however, the parts inside the parenthesis will always be positive. Why Eq.3 uses logits instead of probabilities?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The equation (3) utilises the probability instead of the logits, which is close related with the equation (6) in gambler loss paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.00208).
In Eq.3, the PAL loss uses logits (f_theta) instead of probabilities (p_theta). When using logits, it seems that the parts inside the parenthesis can become negative. When the parts inside the parenthesis becomes negative, the log operation cannot be performed. When using probabilities, however, the parts inside the parenthesis will always be positive. Why Eq.3 uses logits instead of probabilities?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: