You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After using the download functions in a new project, I found the types not clear enough for the user. Should we highlight the types in the documentation?
Additionally, the function list_supported_types() should be mentioned if option 'type' is not supported. We might also consider an option in list_supported_types() to only show domain-specific types, and an option to automatically print all available types (instead of the tibble default length).
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I updated the error message in case a type is not supported and I added the parameters domain and as_vector to the list_supported_types() function. I don't want to explicitly mention the types in the roxygen comments because this gets horrible to maintain.
After using the download functions in a new project, I found the types not clear enough for the user. Should we highlight the types in the documentation?
Additionally, the function list_supported_types() should be mentioned if option 'type' is not supported. We might also consider an option in list_supported_types() to only show domain-specific types, and an option to automatically print all available types (instead of the tibble default length).
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: