You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From a quick look, this may imply that the kknn does not apply an optimal vanilla KNN method. Disregarding other details now, it may be the case that the algorithm may need a minor adjustment to so called 'Ward + polished' linked above, where Ward minimises sum of squares, and complexity is O^2 instead of O^3 + some other polishing.
It could be that I'm missing one of the features in the function (possibly a hidden/undocumented in one of the arguments e.g. weight_func = 'optimal'). Please let me know if this is the case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex: https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue.
I would like to link this as context: https://logarithmic.net/pfh-files/blog/01618034037/k-means-better.html
In the
tidymodels
documentation forkknn
, it cites this paper.From a quick look, this may imply that the
kknn
does not apply an optimal vanilla KNN method. Disregarding other details now, it may be the case that the algorithm may need a minor adjustment to so called 'Ward + polished' linked above, where Ward minimises sum of squares, and complexity is O^2 instead of O^3 + some other polishing.It could be that I'm missing one of the features in the function (possibly a hidden/undocumented in one of the arguments e.g.
weight_func = 'optimal'
). Please let me know if this is the case.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: