You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 24, 2019. It is now read-only.
Don't believe this is too relevant here since we are typically more interested in faster processing and the overhead in encoding/decoding from a universal code would cause a slow-down in the hot loop. The possible stored size improvements are only interesting on huge integers and I expect that even then it would be negigible or evne worse than storing them directly, since typically the words of a big integer can be expected to be relatively random (if calculations aren't centered around a power-of-2 base).
Hi, this reminded me of something a buddy of mine wrote. I'm not sure whether this will be useful, but I thought I'd drop the link just in case.
http://dustinjuliano.com/2016/6/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: