Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make data nodes view consistent with other views #2490

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 5, 2020

Conversation

erimatnor
Copy link
Contributor

Rename the data_node view to data_nodes to be consistent with other
views that all use the plural form.

@erimatnor erimatnor added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Oct 5, 2020
Rename the data_node view to data_nodes to be consistent with other
views that all use the plural form.
@erimatnor erimatnor marked this pull request as ready for review October 5, 2020 09:53
@erimatnor erimatnor requested a review from a team as a code owner October 5, 2020 09:53
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 5, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #2490 into master will increase coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2490      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.08%   90.18%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         212      212              
  Lines       34198    34148      -50     
==========================================
- Hits        30808    30795      -13     
+ Misses       3390     3353      -37     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/loader/bgw_message_queue.c 84.51% <0.00%> (-3.23%) ⬇️
src/loader/bgw_launcher.c 89.53% <0.00%> (-2.47%) ⬇️
src/import/planner.c 70.30% <0.00%> (+11.12%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5a5cbe1...a081a30. Read the comment docs.

@erimatnor erimatnor merged commit 7a406fa into timescale:master Oct 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants