Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move timestamp_limits and with_clause_parser test #3346

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 23, 2021

Conversation

svenklemm
Copy link
Member

Move the timestamp_limits and with_clause_parser test to
regresscheck-shared since those tests don't need a private
database incurring less overhead to run those tests.

@svenklemm svenklemm requested a review from a team as a code owner June 20, 2021 15:21
@svenklemm svenklemm requested review from nikkhils, mfundul and gayyappan and removed request for a team June 20, 2021 15:22
@svenklemm svenklemm self-assigned this Jun 20, 2021
@svenklemm svenklemm force-pushed the shared_test2 branch 4 times, most recently from 9dfa3c3 to f6c6119 Compare June 20, 2021 16:25
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ SET client_min_messages TO ERROR;

SET ROLE :ROLE_DEFAULT_PERM_USER;

CREATE SCHEMA test;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why are we adding this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

timestamp_limits test uses this and on normal regresscheck we precreate that schema too

Copy link
Contributor

@gayyappan gayyappan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changes look good. Question about a test change.

Move the timestamp_limits and with_clause_parser test to
regresscheck-shared since those tests don't need a private
database incurring less overhead to run those tests.
Also add missing ORDER BY clauses to some of the queries
in timestamp_limits to make the output more stable.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 23, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #3346 (4ee5cb8) into master (001f5d9) will decrease coverage by 1.58%.
The diff coverage is 88.45%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3346      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.17%   90.58%   -1.59%     
==========================================
  Files         110      212     +102     
  Lines       14177    35589   +21412     
==========================================
+ Hits        13067    32240   +19173     
- Misses       1110     3349    +2239     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/bgw/launcher_interface.c 72.22% <ø> (+1.63%) ⬆️
src/catalog.h 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/chunk.c 95.90% <ø> (+1.37%) ⬆️
src/chunk.h 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/chunk_adaptive.c 92.57% <ø> (+2.78%) ⬆️
src/chunk_append/chunk_append.c 97.41% <ø> (+0.90%) ⬆️
src/chunk_append/exec.c 95.84% <ø> (+1.66%) ⬆️
src/chunk_append/explain.c 82.81% <ø> (ø)
src/chunk_append/planner.c 93.38% <ø> (-2.27%) ⬇️
src/chunk_append/transform.c 96.66% <ø> (-3.34%) ⬇️
... and 282 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a5caa55...4ee5cb8. Read the comment docs.

@svenklemm svenklemm merged commit 7b67f72 into timescale:master Jun 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants