Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fusion/experimental #393

Open
timotheecour opened this issue Nov 28, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

fusion/experimental #393

timotheecour opened this issue Nov 28, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@timotheecour
Copy link
Owner

std/experimental was IMO a good idea (but was only used for lib/experimental/diff.nim) and allows 0-change migration for clients using the usual import/export or include trick in case it wants to migrate to std/diff once stabilized.

we should IMO do the same for fusion:
modules can mature in fusion/experimental, breaking changes are allowed there, and client code that decides to use those (directly or via transitive closure) should not complain about those.

links

nim-lang#16004 (comment)

@timotheecour
Copy link
Owner Author

#575 may be a better idea, avoid the problem raised

But now we created a situation where it's better to import experimental / module! Because that's the import that actually works with older versions of Nim! So client code becomes:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant