Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about the depth prediction result #42

Closed
yangengt123 opened this issue Dec 20, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Question about the depth prediction result #42

yangengt123 opened this issue Dec 20, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@yangengt123
Copy link

Hi tinghuiz,
I tried your code recently. It worked cool! But after completing all the steps you stated on the website, I found a problem here.

I believe I strictly followed your steps, and trained the model for 200K steps (the default value in your code). The evaluated depth accuracy I got was as follows:
abs_rel, sq_rel, rms, log_rms, d1_all, a1, a2, a3
0.2331, 3.7935, 7.4710, 0.3076, 0.0000, 0.7006, 0.8807, 0.9453

I also tried to disable the pose net and fit the ground truth pose to the model, and got the results shown below.
abs_rel, sq_rel, rms, log_rms, d1_all, a1, a2, a3
0.1889, 2.1794, 6.6112, 0.2708, 0.0000, 0.7413, 0.9053, 0.9597

It seems still worse than the result you post on the page. Is there any further fine-tuning should I make to reach the results rather than simply running the code directly?

Thanks!

@tinghuiz
Copy link
Owner

The final model I used was trained less than 200K steps (somewhere around ~160K I believe), as I noticed that the model started overfitting with longer training. As pointed out in another issue (#34), the weight decay is currently not applied correctly. Adding it could potentially alleviate the overfitting problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants