Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backward pass convs have two reduces #3572

Open
geohot opened this issue Mar 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Backward pass convs have two reduces #3572

geohot opened this issue Mar 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
bounty Active Bounty

Comments

@geohot
Copy link
Collaborator

geohot commented Mar 2, 2024

See in beautiful_mnist

@geohot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

geohot commented Mar 2, 2024

Screenshot 2024-03-02 at 5 00 44 AM

This is the pattern

@chenyuxyz chenyuxyz added the bounty Active Bounty label Mar 10, 2024
@francislata francislata mentioned this issue Mar 19, 2024
7 tasks
@Itssshikhar
Copy link

Hi! just wanted to know that if backward-pass needs both the reduceOps replaced or removed for perf?

@iglesias
Copy link

Hi! just wanted to know that if backward-pass needs both the reduceOps replaced or removed for perf?

I'd guess it is about simplifying the two reduces into one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bounty Active Bounty
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants