New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can you add a BindRandom feature? #26
Comments
What would be the benefit? |
Hello, I would like this feature too ! My personal benefit would be this kind of pattern: Obviously i can use "BindSame yes" and my application could hold the whole IP address list, but I find it easier to maintain if it is the daemon that manages it. Let me know, |
|
I too would love this feature. Having tinyproxy behave as a "proxy gateway" (sorting through many outgoing interfaces, randomizing my traffic) would be amazing. |
imo this is outside the scope of tinyproxy functionality, but with the new upstream proxy capabilities you could just redirect requests to a very simple socks5 proxy to shuffle the outgoing requests. for example there is https://github.com/rofl0r/microsocks/blob/master/sockssrv.c a socks5 server in 400 lines and i guess it'd be much easier to add this functionality to something like that, or some python script. |
The BindSame feature is very useful and easy to use(While squid needs to add many tcp_outgoing_address lines for all interfaces)!
Can you add another feature "BindRandom"?
If enabled, tinyproxy will bind the outgoing connection to a random interface(eth0, eth1, eth2, eth3, ....).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: