You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
Neither of the following lemmas is proved using either OBVIOUS or PTL. The description of the coalescing algorithm for first-order temporal formulas sounds like the CONSTANT version should be provable by first-order backends.
THEOREM ASSUME CONSTANT A, TEMPORAL F(_),
ASSUME CONSTANT B PROVE □F(B)
PROVE □F(A)
THEOREM ASSUME VARIABLE A, TEMPORAL F(_),
ASSUME VARIABLE B PROVE □F(B)
PROVE □F(A)
BY PTL
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Neither of the following lemmas is proved using either OBVIOUS or PTL. The description of the coalescing algorithm for first-order temporal formulas sounds like the CONSTANT version should be provable by first-order backends.
THEOREM ASSUME CONSTANT A, TEMPORAL F(_),
ASSUME CONSTANT B PROVE □F(B)
PROVE □F(A)
THEOREM ASSUME VARIABLE A, TEMPORAL F(_),
ASSUME VARIABLE B PROVE □F(B)
PROVE □F(A)
BY PTL
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: