Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chips/qemu_rv32_virt_chip: implement basic UART RX and add process console to board #3365

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 12, 2023

Conversation

lschuermann
Copy link
Member

Pull Request Overview

Implements basic UART RX support (without abort) and adds the process console component to the board. I didn't want to invest time in supporting receive-abort, as this needs to be migrated to the new UART HIL anyways (#3046).

Testing Strategy

This pull request was tested by using the process console.

TODO or Help Wanted

N/A

Documentation Updated

  • Updated the relevant files in /docs, or no updates are required.

Formatting

  • Ran make prepush.

twilfredo
twilfredo previously approved these changes Jan 2, 2023
hudson-ayers
hudson-ayers previously approved these changes Jan 3, 2023
alistair23
alistair23 previously approved these changes Jan 12, 2023
@hudson-ayers
Copy link
Contributor

bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Feb 7, 2023

Merge conflict.

@lschuermann
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased accordingly, merging if checks succeed.

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2023
3365: chips/qemu_rv32_virt_chip: implement basic UART RX and add process console to board r=lschuermann a=lschuermann

### Pull Request Overview

Implements basic UART RX support (without abort) and adds the process console component to the board. I didn't want to invest time in supporting receive-abort, as this needs to be migrated to the new UART HIL anyways (#3046).

### Testing Strategy

This pull request was tested by using the process console.


### TODO or Help Wanted

N/A


### Documentation Updated

- [x] ~Updated the relevant files in `/docs`,~ or no updates are required.

### Formatting

- [x] Ran `make prepush`.


Co-authored-by: Leon Schuermann <leon@is.currently.online>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Feb 8, 2023

This PR was included in a batch that successfully built, but then failed to merge into master. It will not be retried.

Additional information:

Response status code: 422
{"message":"At least 1 approving review is required by reviewers with write access. Required status check \"netlify/docs-tockosorg/deploy-preview\" is failing.","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/articles/about-protected-branches"}

hudson-ayers
hudson-ayers previously approved these changes Feb 8, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@hudson-ayers hudson-ayers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2023
3365: chips/qemu_rv32_virt_chip: implement basic UART RX and add process console to board r=hudson-ayers a=lschuermann

### Pull Request Overview

Implements basic UART RX support (without abort) and adds the process console component to the board. I didn't want to invest time in supporting receive-abort, as this needs to be migrated to the new UART HIL anyways (#3046).

### Testing Strategy

This pull request was tested by using the process console.


### TODO or Help Wanted

N/A


### Documentation Updated

- [x] ~Updated the relevant files in `/docs`,~ or no updates are required.

### Formatting

- [x] Ran `make prepush`.


Co-authored-by: Leon Schuermann <leon@is.currently.online>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Feb 8, 2023

This PR was included in a batch that successfully built, but then failed to merge into master. It will not be retried.

Additional information:

Response status code: 422
{"message":"Required status check \"netlify/docs-tockosorg/deploy-preview\" is failing.","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/articles/about-protected-branches"}

alistair23
alistair23 previously approved these changes Feb 8, 2023
@lschuermann
Copy link
Member Author

@hudson-ayers Could you give another approval perhaps? This time the Netlify CI didn't glitch out, so maybe fourth time's the charm? 😆

Copy link
Contributor

@hudson-ayers hudson-ayers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Feb 12, 2023

@bors bors bot merged commit c8fcd34 into tock:master Feb 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants