You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been using this bot for a quite a while rn and i must say it's one of the best from what i've seen out there, even if we're using portuguese instead of english with him he got the hang of the basic structure pretty quickly and is already experimenting with combining other words and phrases, but i would like to ask/know if it's possible to make a feature where the bot generates an answer after somebody sends a message in chat instead of the timer, i'm going to be honest with you i don't know how this bot works 100% that's why i'm interested to know if such a thing is possible
Thanks for the attention, Diogo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Ursometamorfo In a way, yes! Through a command: !g.
Any chat member may type !g hello in the chat, and the bot will generate a message starting with hello. You can also simply use !g, and the bot will generate a message just like with the timer. (!g is short for !generate, which works identically)
However, it's not possible for the bot to generate a message directly after someone sends an arbitrary message. It will only generate if that message starts with !g or !generate.
(If this doesn't do anything, then make sure that "EnableGenerateCommand" is set to true in the settings.json configuration file)
I've been using this bot for a quite a while rn and i must say it's one of the best from what i've seen out there, even if we're using portuguese instead of english with him he got the hang of the basic structure pretty quickly and is already experimenting with combining other words and phrases, but i would like to ask/know if it's possible to make a feature where the bot generates an answer after somebody sends a message in chat instead of the timer, i'm going to be honest with you i don't know how this bot works 100% that's why i'm interested to know if such a thing is possible
Thanks for the attention, Diogo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: