Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SRP fixes #131

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 29, 2016
Merged

SRP fixes #131

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 29, 2016

Conversation

tomato42
Copy link
Member

@tomato42 tomato42 commented Aug 25, 2016

update SRP command examples

make the commands work with both python2 and python3

should fix #130


This change is Reviewable

the example uses incorrect syntax for SRP ciphersuites,
use the current one
make the internal interfaces use bytearrays to pass usernames
and passwords around, retain public API that accepts str

add test cases so that file-based database continues to work

fix verifierdb to work in python3 with files
@tomato42 tomato42 added the bug unintented behaviour in tlslite-ng code label Aug 25, 2016
@tomato42 tomato42 added this to the v0.6.0 milestone Aug 25, 2016
@sanderux
Copy link

tested, works!
thnx

@tomato42 tomato42 added the review request PR finished, ready for review label Aug 26, 2016
@tomato42
Copy link
Member Author

@The-Mule r?

@The-Mule
Copy link
Collaborator

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, 9 of 9 files at r2.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved, some commit checks failed.


Comments from Reviewable

@The-Mule
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks good, r+

@tomato42 tomato42 merged commit e6182d5 into master Aug 29, 2016
@tomato42 tomato42 deleted the srp-cli-syntax branch August 29, 2016 21:27
@tomato42
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the review!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug unintented behaviour in tlslite-ng code review request PR finished, ready for review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TypeError in SRP example
3 participants