Correct licence

[v-v-v]

Hi,

I just wanted to mention that the README file mentions that the this code is free to use under the terms of the Ruby's licence but the gemspec file sets the license to MIT.

MIT is the correct licence, right?

[toy]

Hi, thanks for opening the issue!

It seems I've forgot to change the license field in the gemspec when creating the gem, so it stayed MIT. Original code was under Ruby license, I'm not sure about possibility to change the license and my understanding is that Ruby license is even more permissive, so it seems that the right thing would be to just change the license in gemspec and release a new minor version.

[v-v-v]

Thanks for the clarification!