Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

revision of client-go dependency in vendor needs bumped! #2840

Closed
yue9944882 opened this issue Feb 12, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

revision of client-go dependency in vendor needs bumped! #2840

yue9944882 opened this issue Feb 12, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@yue9944882
Copy link
Contributor

yue9944882 commented Feb 12, 2018

Do you want to request a feature or report a bug?

feature

What did you expect to see?

https://github.com/containous/traefik/blob/6a92ac0b7b04ea69a995f7635c0a7fb81fdfc952/Gopkg.toml#L189
I think it's sort of outdated. Any plan on upgrading this?

And kubernetes release-1.5 seems not maintained any more. Bumping this can activate more client-side utilities without breaking the compatibility. WDYT?

Branch Canonical source code location Maintenance status
client-go 1.4 Kubernetes main repo, 1.4 branch = -
client-go 1.5 Kubernetes main repo, 1.5 branch = -
client-go 2.0 Kubernetes main repo, 1.5 branch = -
client-go 3.0 Kubernetes main repo, 1.6 branch = -
client-go 4.0 Kubernetes main repo, 1.7 branch
client-go 5.0 Kubernetes main repo, 1.8 branch
client-go 6.0 Kubernetes main repo, 1.9 branch
client-go HEAD Kubernetes main repo, master branch
@yue9944882
Copy link
Contributor Author

@timoreimann

@timoreimann
Copy link
Contributor

Updating client-go has definitely been on my list for quite a while. Apart from some improved functionality in the library itself, it might also help us reduce the amount of dependencies we have as upstream client-go has had a few unnecessary deps in the past.

glide used to be a blocker; with our transition to dep, however, updating should now be easier. Whoever does the change must be prepared though that a ton of packages have moved around, so it might not be that easy.

@yue9944882 if you want to take a stab, I'd be happy!

@yue9944882
Copy link
Contributor Author

@timoreimann Of course I will have a try on that :-)

@traefik traefik locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 1, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants