You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should come up with a systematic way to attribute people who've contributed ideas or coding to a GitHub commit.
Right now, we add each other as co-authors if we've co-contributed code to a branch/commit, but don't have a system for other contributors.
In two recent commits I mentioned others (commit 0b04d61; seed trait workshop outcomes; commit e5e1b0d; seed mass errors that Isaac Towers noticed), but we should have a more consistent system for where this information is stored.
For instance, maybe a standalone section of the document, or where we list contributions / funding etc.
In addition mentioning the people with either their GitHub name (@...) or simply their name in commits should become standard practice.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We should come up with a systematic way to attribute people who've contributed ideas or coding to a GitHub commit.
Right now, we add each other as
co-authors
if we've co-contributed code to a branch/commit, but don't have a system for other contributors.In two recent commits I mentioned others (commit 0b04d61; seed trait workshop outcomes; commit e5e1b0d; seed mass errors that Isaac Towers noticed), but we should have a more consistent system for where this information is stored.
For instance, maybe a standalone section of the document, or where we list contributions / funding etc.
In addition mentioning the people with either their GitHub name (@...) or simply their name in commits should become standard practice.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: